Answer:
"Yes" will be the correct response.
Explanation:
- The dealership has been obliged to Edward since Edward as well as Dealer had written agreements stating that somehow Edwards may acquire their motorbike on the day before the fifteenth of June.
- The two parties offered and otherwise accepted as well as agreed in writing. That's because the contract remained valid, Dealer may be prosecuted as well for contravention.
In the exact moment you run out of laundry detergent and realize you need to pick some up at the store, you are in the problem recognition stage of the buying decision process. The problem recognition stage is realizing you have to make the purchase versus deciding to make the purchase of something.
Answer and Explanation:
There is no copyright infringement here. Savant homes had not taken a copyright protection for the design prior to this time. Also in the case it was found that the design is not in fact a unique design by Savant homes as it is used widely and was common before savant homes used it. And so it was a dummy model for everyone to copy from. Therefore the infringement was considered invalid as there was no ground for savant homes to claim it as am intellectual property
A is correct, sales tax is the same for everybody in a state, no matter the income. Hope this helps!