6 divided by 2 (1+2)=
2 answers:
You might be interested in
<span><u><em>Answer:</em></u>
18
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
To round a number to the nearest whole number, we would check the fraction part:
If the fraction is <u>less than</u> 0.5, then we would simply ignore the fraction
If the fraction is <u>equal to or more than </u>0.5, then we would add 1 to the whole number and eliminate the fraction.
<u>In the given , we have:</u>
</span>
<span>.
The fraction part is </span>
<span> which is greater than 0.5
This means that we would add one to the whole number (round it up) and eliminate the fraction.
Therefore, the answer would be 18.
Hope this helps :)</span>
18
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
To round a number to the nearest whole number, we would check the fraction part:
If the fraction is <u>less than</u> 0.5, then we would simply ignore the fraction
If the fraction is <u>equal to or more than </u>0.5, then we would add 1 to the whole number and eliminate the fraction.
<u>In the given , we have:</u>
</span>
The fraction part is </span>
This means that we would add one to the whole number (round it up) and eliminate the fraction.
Therefore, the answer would be 18.
Hope this helps :)</span>
Answer:
Let x represents the number of pants and y represents the number of shirts.
As per the statement:
Since, a clothing store are selling pants for $8.99 and shirts for $3.99
then;
total number of Pants cost is, $8.99x and total number of Shirt cost is, $3.99
Also, it is given that: You can spend as much as $60 and want to buy at least two pairs of pants.
then, we have the equation of inequality;
;......[1] where x, y are natural number.
x-intercept:
Substitute the value y= 0 in [1] and solve for x;
Simplify:
Since, x is in natural number;
Similarly.
For y-intercept:
Substitute the value x= 0 in [1] and solve for x;
Simplify:
Therefore, we have
;
and