<span>The natives often had their living areas overrun by settlers who were looking to expand in the new colonies and the new continent. In addition, the natives did not have resistance to many of the diseases that were being brought to the new lands from Europe, which rendered them vulnerable to decimation by a fast-moving outbreak of these illnesses, many of which did greatly lower the native populations.</span>
Answer:
B) Nuclear Warfare
Explanation:
B) nuclear warfare is the most possible answer since both russia and Us had nuclear weapons at the time, and both countries were threatening each other. But were the cold war get hot, I personally believe nuclear warfare wouldn't have happened because of MAD -- Mutually Assured Destruction. If Russia nuclear bombed US, then it was certain that US would bomb Russia and both countries would be completely decimated so there was no point in Nuclear Warfare.
Answer:
Option B, American settlers in California staged a revolt with the help of the United States navy, is the right answer.
Explanation:
The Mexican–American War was a war fought between the United States and Mexico. This war took place in the period between 1846 to 1848. During this war, the American settlers in California launched a revolt, this revolt came to be known as the Bear Flag Revolt. The settlers rebelled against the government of Mexico and proclaimed a California as an independent republic. In this revolt, the Navy of the United States helped the rebels.
Answer: I. their sublime courage
II. their willingness to suffer
III. their amazing discipline in the midst of great provocation
Explanation: A sit in is an organized non-violent protest demonstration in which participants seat themselves in a place and refuse to move. Martin Luther King Jr. and his fellow protesters were arrested and sent to jail for a sit in protesting segregation in Birmingham, Alabama. After reading an open letter from eight white clergymen in the local newspaper criticizing him and his fellow activists, he decided to write back to let them know what was on his mind.
The letter defends the strategy of nonviolent resistance to racism. It pointed out that people have a moral responsibility to break unjust laws and take direct action rather than waiting potentially forever for justice to come through the courts.
Furthermore, he wrote that he wished the protesters had been commended for the three reasons above and that despite provocation, the protests never turned violent.
