Why was Fort Sumter of strategic importance to the North and the South?

2 answers:

Colt1911 [192]2 years ago

7 0

North: They had troops, guns, equipment, and provisions inside, and they owned it, and so they wanted to keep it.
South: It was located in the South, and they thought it was rightfully theirs, and that is why they wanted it

It didn't really have any strategic importance, however, it had political importance

hope this helps

Mumz [18]2 years ago

3 0

The North had many thing inside the fort that was all there stuff.

The South had technical ownership over the fort itself so they wanted/ needed to keep that ownership.

You might be interested in

What else happened before the cherokee left. from trail of tears?

grigory [225]

Before the Cherokee left on the Trial of Tears, the Cherokee people were divided, that was the best way to handle the government´s determination to get its hands on their territory. Some wanted to stay and fight, ohers thought it was better to agree to leave in exchange for money and other concessions.

In 1835 a few self appointed representatives of the Cherokee nation negotiated the treaty of New Echota, which traded all Cherokee land east of the Mississippi for US$ 5 Million, relocation assistance and compensation for lost properties.

7 0

3 years ago

How does the U.S. Constitution best reflect the ideal of separation of powers? Giving brainliest

avanturin [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

Seperation of powers is the seperation of the powers into 3 branches

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the years following World War II, the United States established a policy of containment to

Citrus2011 [14]