The cotton gin made it so seeds did not have to be individually picked by the slaves. This saved hours upon hours of work, and it made it so less slaves were needed to process the cotton. All the slaves had to do was put the cotton into the machine and the seeds would get pulled out. It actually increased the demand of slaves instead of diminishing it. You would think since less slaves were needed to process the cotton, there would be less demand. Instead what happened was the slave owners made more slaves pick the cotton since the cotton gin made it so easy to process. It majorly impacted the slave industry, which was a major problem in America at the time.
When people bought war bonds so they can loan the government money to help the war effort.
<span>Religious beliefs have
highly influenced the political and hierarchical structures in both Ottoman and
Safavid Persia empires. Although both states were of Islamic religion, they
belonged to different branches, Sunni and Shia. These branches differ over the
choice of Muhammad's successor, which subsequently acquired broader political
significance, as well as theological and juridical dimensions. Sunni Muslims
believed that Muhammad didn’t clearly appoint a successor, which is why there
isn’t hereditary succession law in Ottoman Empire. This contrasts with the Shia
Muslims view, which holds that Muhammad appointed his son-in-law and cousin Ali
ibn Abi Talib to succeed him. They believed that the empire should be led by
direct successor of Muhammad’s line. Differences between these two branches
affected the politics, as Shia Muslims weren’t religiously tolerant to other
confessions and considered them for heretics, even the other branches of Islam.
This resulted in the besieged of Bagdad, which was followed by the massacre of
a large part of its Sunni Muslim inhabitants, as it was endeavored to transform
Baghdad into a purely Shiite city. The besiege of Bagdad was the event that led
to the Ottoman-Safavid war (1623–1639).</span>
This would be C, Hopes this helps