Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Northwest Ordinance of 1787
Explanation:
The Bill of Rights addressed inalienable rights for citizens only.
The Connecticut Compromise did not pertain to this issue.
The North-South Statehood Act does not exist.
SOURCE FOR MY ANSWER: https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=8
The gulf of Tonkin incident led the United States Congress
to overwhelming approve the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. This resolution gave
President Lyndon B. Johnson virtually unlimited powers to oppose communist
aggression in Southeast Asia. President Lyndon was also advised on how any
potential war with the North Vietnamese might be fought.
They are happy because the huns were good people so they were not worried about being force to doing cetrain things
Japanese-American citizens were denied their rights and sent to internment camps, as the government believed that some of them were working with the Japanese government, and could feed intel back to them. At the end of the war, however, these citizens were released.
