Federal Government > State Government
The rationale for this is that we live in a global world and need collective responses to global challenges. Instead of there being a Utah response and a Virginia response to the need for more STEM graduates, there should be a US response. Economies of scale also come into play. It can cost less and be more efficient to have resources centralized.
State Government > Federal Government
America was founded after a revolution rejected a strong central monarchy and America needs to continue to honor that by allowing citizens in Utah to have different approaches than Virginia. When convenient, the states can choose to collectively band together on issues like defense but that should be the exception and not the rule.
Answer:
There were 2 primary types of government, a democracy, and a hierarchy. A hierarchy had a few different variants, the ruler had all power and was a god, the ruler controlled people, and the ruler had the most power but had a small house of other "government officials"
If I had a kingdom, it would have a democracy as its government. A group of advisors, the house/senate, and what many think is the ultimate power but has equal power, the president/king. Democracy is important. Not too much though, or else you get communism. Now, things were different back then. Most people kept what they had, and the citizens ran their own "government" of sorts. But a democratic government is still needed to control, and maintain the people. When I say control, I don't mean "give me all of your money and earnings and we will give you what you earned in food, water, clothes, and a house." That's communism. What I mean by control, is enforce the rules, make sure that the people don't tear each other apart, limb from limb. The people need guided to the decided way of living, which THEY CHOSE by voting. Therefore, they chose to follow these guidelines, and should not argue. That is how to run a stable government. On paper. Of course, there would be plenty of people who want to cause problems, but those things are too unpredictable to handle without communism. Not saying that it is the only way to run a government, what I meant was those things will be deal with at the time and can't be fixed on a simple word document for a history lesson on a computer learning system meant for a sixth grader to answer in a few sentences, about why you should be good to people, and not meant to go into detail about communism, and meant to see who understands how to live a happy human life, and who knows how to be the next "president" of Russia, and also just to see students creativity and knowledge of world politics as well as their downright opinion. I probably went into a lot of detail but hit the word limit.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
the answer to this Question is Wood
Explanation:
Answer:
B. virtually ignores aspects of cognitive that are NOT linear.
Explanation:
A major weakness of the information-processing perspective is that it virtually ignores aspects of cognitive that are not linear and logical.
It is worthy of note to know the meaning/ definition of information processing.
Information processing can be described as situation whereby information are processed, typically by an organism of a computer system inorder to derived or yield new or more useful information.
Answer:
I have the power to influence the future of my community by paying attention to the zoning laws, the property taxes, and the bylaws that potential representatives are supporting and voting for the candidate that supports my position on these issues.
Explanation:
The kind of issues that I can influence with my vote are: 1) zoning laws for example. I might be against the construction of high-rises in my neighborhood and I can vote for authorities that claim they will protect the current zoning laws prohibiting high-rise development in my areas. 2) Property taxes are another issue. I might support raising property taxes if they will go to improvements in education in my district for example. 3) Bylaws are another area I can perhaps influence by choosing for whom I vote. The candidate might promise to take a stronger position on the ownership of certain dangerous breeds of dogs in my city, for example.
