Given the following information, compute the property tax rate for the community in percentage terms. Total budget expenditures:
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer: Project X
Explanation:
The Payback period is the amount of time it would take for the cash inflows accruing from an investment to payoff the cost of the investment.
Project X has a constant cashflow of $24,000 for 3 years and a cost of $68,000 for the Payback period is;
= 68,000/24,000
= 2.83 years
Project Y has an uneven cash flow with a cost of $60,000. Payback is calculated as;
= Year before payback + Amount left to be paid/cashflow in year of payback
Year before payback = 4,000 + 26,000 + 26,000
= $56,000
This means that the third year is the year before payback.
60,000 - 56,000 = $4,000
Payback period = 3 + 4,000/20,000
= 3.2 years
Based on a Payback period of 3 years, only Project X should be chosen as it pays back in less than 3 years.
The amount of 3000 will have to be deposited to earn $90 of interest for 8 months, if money is deposited in a bank that pay's simple interest of 4.5%.
Explanation:
The given is,
Simple interest of 4.5 %
Earn $90 of interest for 8 months
Step:1
Formula to calculate the simple interest method,
...................................(1)
Where,
F - Future amount
P - Initial investment
i - Rate of interest
N - Number of years
From given,
i - 4.5%
Let, X - Initial investment, P = X
F = P + Interest amount
F = X + 90
From the equation (1),
(∵ N = 8 months = = 0.667 year )
= 3000
P = X = $ 3000
From the X value.
F = P + 90
= 3000 + 90
F = $ 3090
Result:
The amount of 3000 will have to be deposited to earn $90 of interest for 8 months, if money is deposited in a bank that pay's simple interest of 4.5%.
Answer:
The answer is "choice a"
Explanation:
In the given question the missing choices is added in attached file please find it.
The additional output produced through hiring an extra item of such an input reflects the marginal product (MP). For the very first time. for example, its marginal labor productivity was increased output generated by recruiting additional work.
This law diminishing marginal returns as more as units that even the marginal result of even an input, that is hired input.
In other words, any additional work input would generate less than a previous employee because recruiting additional workers decreases expected revenue on jobs, the laid-off of employees, which means the Labor would grow expected revenue.
In Japan is laying off fewer employees even despite the slowdown it continues to produce strong outputs. The lower-priced revenues and their work remain constant along with their steady overall performance.
Your medium product (total) item divided by total work would stay intact. United states staff layover to the other side. It laid-off the staff equals higher marginal labor for overall returns it's going to be higher production besides that, lower labor in the United States could mean an increase in the gross labor output but a larger for Japan, more then, that's why the choice a is correct.
