Answer:
Ukraine. Gaza. Syria. Yemen. Pakistan. If it feels like the United States is always at war somewhere, that's because it is. Not just Iraq and Afghanistan - the two wars we all know about. And, granted, we're not only talking boots on the ground. It's our money, our weapons and - more often in recent weeks - our Secretary of State, engaged in high-stakes diplomacy to uneven results. At his last count, investigative journalist Kevin Gosztola put the U.S. war count at 74. These are mostly unannounced and undeclared wars against enemies that have different aspirations, strategies and ideologies.
Why? The official line varies. Some conflict engagement is, we're told, about nation-building (Iraq and Afghanistan.) Other operations are to remove a despotic ruler (Syria, Libya.) Some engagement is designed to pick off a terror group/groups (Oman, Pakistan, Yemen) and/or to spread "true" democracy (Iraq and Afghanistan, again.) There are wars we engage in to free people from a cycle of fear (Central African Republic) to stem the flow of hundreds-year-old bloodletting (Israel/Palestine) and to keep old foes in check (Ukraine/Russia).
Answer: Option (A)
Explanation:
Here, in this particular scenario the client would gives up his/her <em>fiduciary duty of undivided loyalty</em>. The fiduciary duty is referred to as the legal act responsibility i.e. the accountability to perform completely or exclusively in the best interest of the other individual or the other party. Here, the client does not have complete level of the duties.
The summary of the excerpt, the sentence which best describe is it effectively paraphrases the excerpt but does not correctly use a quotation. So, the excerpt effectively paraphrases but does not correctly use a quotation. It is effectively paraphrases th excerpt but it does not correctly use a quotation.
Answer:
its type of government
Explanation:
The characteristic of a nation that has the most significant impact on citizenship participation in governments throughout Southern and Eastern Asia is "its type of government"
This is evident in the fact that there are different forms of government in these regions that limit or improve the participation of citizens in the governments.
For example, India, Nepal, and Pakistan make use of federal republics, thereby there is an increase in the participation of the citizens in their government. However, places like Bhutan use constitutional monarchy, and North Korea uses absolute monarchy which greatly limits the participation of their citizens in their government.
