This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced.
Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied.
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld.
Answer:
c) He became an important military and political leader who supported revolutions in several Latin American colonies.
Answer:
Checks and Balances
Explanation:
One of the rights of congress is the right to impeach the president if they think he is to tyrannical. Checks and balances itself though is an example of separation of powers
It is A. Kublai Khan I just took the test and got a 100% the answers are
1 D. Marco polo
2 A. Kublai Khan
3 <span>A.Travel by land was hazardous because of difficult terrain.
</span><span><span>C.Merchants, more than anyone else, undertook long-distance travel.</span><span><span> And finally
<span>D.</span></span><span>Travelers used a variety of pack animals, including camels, horses, and yaks.</span></span></span>
According to Eisenhower, Japan's trading business will be in danger if Communism expanded to Asia.
Japan relied on countries in South East Asia to buy their resources that they use in their production. If these countries (such as thailand, Indonesia, and myanmar) falls to communists, Japan will be imposed a heavy tariff to acquire their normal amount of materials.
