1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fantom [35]
3 years ago
15

Describe the conflicts that have arisen between those who claim first amendment rights and those who are in favor of sedition la

ws that might restrict freedom of speech. explainhow the supreme court attemptsto balance competing interests. describe the various tests that the court has applied.
History
1 answer:
statuscvo [17]3 years ago
6 0
This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced. 

Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied. 
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld. 
You might be interested in
What was Germany's newest military strategy in invading other countries?
kramer

Answer: Blitzkrieg

Germany's strategy was to defeat its opponents in a series of short campaigns. Germany quickly overran much of Europe and was victorious for more than two years by relying on a new military tactic called the "Blitzkrieg" (lightning war)

hope it helps.

8 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP WORTH 30 POINTS WILL GIVE BRANLIEST Speech Template Text Version
Alex

Here you go!

1) Checks and Balances- This idea is implemented in the Constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. For example, the legislative branch(Congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (President). If the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. Vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. This check on power ensures that Congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) Anti-Federalists do not want to ratify the Constitution unless it includes a Bill of Rights. The Anti-Federalists are worried that the Constitution gives too much power to the federal government. Having a strong central government caused problems when the US was still part of Great Britain. This is why the Anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) Federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix America's weak political structure. Before the US Constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the Articles of Confederation. This constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

7 0
3 years ago
if anyone steals an animal from a leader in the court, the thief shall pay back thirty times the animal’s value. if it belongs t
Black_prince [1.1K]

Although you did not specify the civilizations you should compare Hammurabi's code with, here I leave relevant points about the code that may help you:

  • Hammurabi's code is a collection of laws carved in a stone pillar during the Babylonian emperor Hammurabi's realm. After conquering the land within the Mesopotamian valley, he needed to unify the territory of his empire under the same laws. It is the first written code of laws.
  • As laws were written, judges could not change them at the moment. This was a guarantee of justice for citizens. Other civilizations like the Romans and Hebrews also had written codes of laws.
  • The code includes mainly a list of crimes and punishments established for them. The punishments defer according to the social rank of the victim and the criminal.
  • Punishments could be payments in species or metals, but also corporal, following the "eye for an eye" criteria of justice, or Tallion's law. This concept of justice can also be found in old Hebrew tradition, and in the Quran.

You can learn more about Hammurabi's code in the link below:

brainly.com/question/13117286

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
What led to the conflict within the Republican Army after its victory at San Antonio
Colt1911 [192]
They got showered in gold and riches
7 0
3 years ago
Which country was specifically blamed for wwi and required to pay reparations?.
Paha777 [63]

Answer:

Germany was blamed and was required topay reparations.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Virginia Plan preferred representation based upon (5 points)
    8·2 answers
  • Which group received the right to vote last?
    13·2 answers
  • How did Eastern Europe react to becoming Soviet satellites?
    10·1 answer
  • QUICK
    6·1 answer
  • The composition of the passenger list indicates that these colonists were likely a part of what
    11·1 answer
  • Therefore there is no reason for her to carry feelings or sentiments that do not pertain to her.
    5·1 answer
  • Which one of the following was the main reason that Constantinople was a good location for the capital of the Byzantine Empire?
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE ANSWER ASAP 50 POINTS
    8·1 answer
  • Did the emperor of the qin dynasty share with the other lords
    8·1 answer
  • In 1959, revolutionary leader Fidel Castro established a regime in _________ based on socialist principles.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!