Between 1863 and 1865 the ability to raise an army became

History

1 answer:

tester [92]3 years ago

8 0

<u>Answer</u>:

Between 1863 and 1865 the ability to raise an army became A) eually difficult in the north and south

<u>Explanation</u>:

The changing nature of war has been seen throughout history and the Civil war of America was no different. The war between the South and the North in the years 1863 and 1865 raised the need for increased manpower.

The North mostly contain industrial labourers while the South mostly consists of farmers. Both are not well trained and having less interest to participate in the war. As wars can not be fought without men, it became significant to increase the army. But the South and the North both faced the difficulty of addressing this need as resources were not available and the government was already in turmoil. Therefore, this resulted in less manpower.

You might be interested in

Which statement below is supported by information in the report?

jeyben [28]

What are the options?!? Please add or repost this with the options

7 1

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The NWSA and AWSA. merged in 1890 to form the NAWSA, whoch pushed for:

qwelly [4]

I believe that it is A , i remember hearing it i. history class

8 0

3 years ago

Which aspect of the March on Washington sent a powerful statement to the United States and the world?

wlad13 [49]

Answer:

the size of the crowd that attended (D)

Explanation:

https://quizlet.com/301721088/topic-test-3-92-flash-cards/

for all the answers to your quiz ^^

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the united states assert itself as an independent nation

devlian [24]

The Revolutionary War with Britain after British colonists were already in the US, sent by the British. Basically, they were being taxed on stuff like Molasses and Tea. They didn't want taxation from a country in which they had no representation in government. This was the reason for the Boston Tea Party. Then of course they formed their own independent country once they were free from Britain.

5 0

3 years ago

Do you think the framers of the Constitution could have limited or banned slavery? Why or why not?

malfutka [58]

Answer: Here you go

Explanation:

The founders of the constitution were not able to ban or limit slavery at the time. The reason being that the South was not accepting of the constitution without them being able to own slaves and because of that slaves were allowed to be own till the civil war. The reason behind the South not accepting the constitution was because slaves were the driving reason the south was thriving, without slaves the souths economy would have tanked since farming was their main industry, unlike the north which was an overall industrial powerhouse.

4 0

3 years ago