I think it's a complicated proposition, usually people with psychic problems are often not taken seriously, and seen as less deserving. I think maybe you should see a different uncle thanking them for thanking them, as it is also difficult for people who have been seriously injured. Perhaps a form of support and after the completion of treatment the medal.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did attach further context or references.
However, we can comment on the following.
The hyperfocus on crime among athletes is limited to these two sports: football and basketball.
The reason why is that these two sports produce too many "stars" that have too much notoriety for their conduct and behaviors. Some of the athletes that participate in these professional sports got too much attention from the media and the public and are considered famous. This popularity often produces that they lost the ground and act in incongruent ways, many times making the worts decisions that impact their careers by the mistakes they make.
As the public figures they are, their behavior immediately makes the news, and their poor judgment often brings negative consequences to their careers.
Answer:
The evidence that a researcher decides to use should be from a credible source and should be track-able.
It can or cannot back the hypothesis created by the researcher. In both cases, the researcher must synthesis it properly into his research. It must build a connection and somewhat extends the points discussed in the hypothesis.
Either way it should have a direction. Something that does not connect to the core of research must not be added in it.
I’m located in South America
