I think they didn’t really have a judgement about who owned the land but had different tribes of different people, the different tribes might’ve had controversy against each other but that isn’t exactly known. Conflicts over the use and ownership of Native lands are not new. Land has been at the center of virtually every significant interaction between Natives and non-Natives since the earliest days of European contact with the indigenous peoples of North America. By the 19th century, federal Indian land policies divided communal lands among individual tribal members in a proposed attempt to make them into farmers. The result instead was that struggling tribes were further dispossessed of their land. In recent decades, tribes, corporations, and the federal government have fought over control of Native land and resources in contentious protests and legal actions, including the Oak Flat, the San Francisco Peaks Controversy, and the Keystone XL pipeline
Yes it is its not allowed to trade with other countries
B. The Rejection of religious themes
During the late 1800s, the nature of contact with Great Britain and India was that Great Britain ruled India and exported agricultural goods from India to Britain.
<h3>What was India like in the late 1800s?</h3>
During that period, the British had all but solidified their rule and control over India and they used this position to benefit from the nation.
One way they did this was by ensuring that agricultural produce such as tea flowed to Britain in regular fashion regardless of the famines in India.
Find out more on famines in India at brainly.com/question/26294371.
#SPJ1
