1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dimas [21]
3 years ago
6

Evidence collected in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECP

A), or other aspects of the U.S. Code may not be admissible to a court under the terms of the _______________.
Law
1 answer:
Scorpion4ik [409]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Exclusionary Rule.

Explanation:

The exclusionary rule is a legal rule of the constitution that prevents any illegal search and seizure of 'evidence' that is collected in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. It also prevents the presentation of such 'evidence' in a court of law.

This rule also states that any evidence collected in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) may not be admissible in a court of law as legal evidence as it is 'seized' in violation of the person's constitutional rights. The Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution prevents the government from doing any search or seizure of 'evidence' of a person's home without due reasonable reason. Thus, it prevents a person's from being forcefully searched. So, when such searches are done and evidence produced before the court, they are not admissible under the exclusionary rule.

You might be interested in
In Florida, a _____ curb indicates an area where parking is prohibited.
egoroff_w [7]

Explanation:

a yellow curb is the answer to this question

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
TRUE/FALSE. scholastik inc. owns the u.s. copyright to a popular book series. it is the only company with the legal right to pub
lesya [120]

The statement 'Scholastic Inc. is the only company with the legal right to publish books in the series in the united states' is false.

<h3>What are the publishing rights?</h3>
  1. The right to publish your work without having it published simultaneously elsewhere.
  2. Publishers frequently ask for exclusive rights for a predetermined period of time, such as three, six or one year.
  3. After the term of exclusivity has passed, you may publish your work anywhere.

<h3>What do publication rights and permissions mean?</h3>
  1. The ability to provide the content in all formats and media so that it can be used even after publication on cutting-edge technology.
  2. The power to defend an author's rights in their writing against third parties, as in instances of plagiarism or copyright infringement.
  3. Authors and other right holders can safeguard their work and manage or license others' use of it thanks to intellectual property regulations.

The statement 'Scholastic Inc. is the only company with the legal right to publish books in the series in the united states' is false.

To know more about publishing rights, visit:

brainly.com/question/29496684

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
6. If Marcus is caught with a small amount of marijuana but his state won't
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

B. Decriminalization

Explanation:

He is guilty of possession but due to decriminalization in his State he won't be arrested

6 0
3 years ago
1. According to the law of supply,
likoan [24]

Answer:

A rise in price almost always leads to an increase in the quantity supplied of that good or service, while a fall in price will decrease the quantity supplied.

Explanation:

hope it help

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When do you have the right of way at an intersection
    10·2 answers
  • What degree should freedom of speech be protected in schools? Essay
    11·2 answers
  • 3. NEWSPAPER SAYS MAYOR IS A CROOK, LIAR, AND DRUNKARD
    10·1 answer
  • The Model Penal Code (MPC) provides that
    10·1 answer
  • 1 - 17 + 1 is what????????
    6·2 answers
  • Help ASAP law ty thankssss !!!
    7·1 answer
  • Kung ikaw ay magiging gobernador, ano ang iyong ipapangako sa bayan?​
    7·1 answer
  • Which is NOT been a reason for the increased need of forensic science evidence?
    8·1 answer
  • Why can't you call the number for this
    6·1 answer
  • When reviewing a lower court decision, an appellate court will:1) review the transcripts of the lower court.2) read briefs from
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!