1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yuradex [85]
3 years ago
11

What is an executive agreement

Law
1 answer:
ahrayia [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer1:an international agreement, usually regarding routine administrative matters not warranting a formal treaty, made by the executive branch of the US government without ratification by the Senate Answer2: An executive agreement is an agreement between the heads of government of two or more nations that has not been ratified by the legislature as treaties are ratified. Executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legally binding

You might be interested in
What was the purpose to Thomas Paine’s Common Sense and what Foundational American document did it help inspire?
Viefleur [7K]
It helped to convince loyalists to become patriots I’ll try to find the second answer
5 0
3 years ago
A supporter of the principle of selective incorporation would most agree with
ivolga24 [154]
D

A supporter of this principle would want the Bill of Rights to apply to all the states like it does the federal government.
5 0
3 years ago
Under what conditions may "reasonable
Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:sorry i need points

Explanation: although i think the answer is to over come suspect resistance

6 0
2 years ago
Free eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Flura [38]

Answer:

thank youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Porfa, no entiendo como se hace
kkurt [141]

Answer:

Mira la respuesta a continuación

Explanation:

En una democracia, cada individuo tiene derechos a la libertad que van desde el habla, el movimiento, la asociación, la vida, etc. Sin embargo, las leyes hechas por las autoridades de un estado son vinculantes para todos los ciudadanos de ese estado. La autonomía no debe confundirse con rebelión e insubordinación. Ningún individuo está por encima de la ley y no hay libertad para la desobediencia de las leyes hechas por la autoridad de un estado.

Además, no hay licencia para que la autoridad infrinja los derechos de las personas. Es por eso que existe el derecho a la libertad de audiencia imparcial. Los ciudadanos pueden demandar a la autoridad si presentan leyes que están en contra de las personas. Las personas, en este caso, pueden ejercer sus derechos.

Por lo tanto, es cierto que en una sociedad que funciona democráticamente, cualquier oposición planteada por el autor puede ser superada porque tanto el individuo como la autoridad tienen derecho a una audiencia imparcial en el tribunal de justicia.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the roles of the Corrections component in the criminal justice system?
    10·1 answer
  • Describe a karen <br><br> if right gets brainliest
    8·1 answer
  • Explain 2 ways in which your local newspaper doesn't reflect the society or community you live in​
    7·1 answer
  • Is this constitutional? <br> Explain answer using the case provided.
    10·1 answer
  • What type of professional could BEST help the relationship between the police and the citizens ?
    10·1 answer
  • Người vi phạm hành chính thì bị xử lý hành chính đúng hay sai tại sao
    6·1 answer
  • What is state ,main components of state and 5 theory of state​
    8·1 answer
  • What is a short order cook vs line cook.
    7·1 answer
  • For a legal case, the location in which the trial may be held is appropriate in the county where the _______ resides.
    5·2 answers
  • How long do you have to renew your license after it expires.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!