Answer: A. a disagreement between the states over representation in Congress.
The main disagreement was over whether representation would be the same for all states, or based on a state's population size. Then there was also a question, for basing representation on population size, about whether slaves counted in a state's population or not.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise were worked out during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 in order to resolve these issues.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. Initially, a unicameral (one-chamber) legislature was envisioned. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
President James Monroe announces another U.S. outside strategy activity that winds up plainly known as the "Monroe Doctrine." The neutralist position of the Monroe Doctrine was likewise a foundation of U.S. remote approach in the nineteenth century, and it took the two world wars of the twentieth century to draw a reluctant America into its new part as a noteworthy worldwide power.
National efforts to reduce environmental risk are based on the best available scientific information;federal laws protecting human health and the environment are enforced fairly and effectively
Answer:
the answer is D
Explanation:
Local governments are responsible for local issues, such as running the police and fire departments and maintaining public works, such as street cleaning, snow removal, and signage. Local governments take charge of public works projects because it would be too difficult for state governments and the federal government to run so many public works programs throughout the country.
