Taking a walk may lead to more creative thinking than sitting, according to research at Stanford University. In one of several [
studies], 48 college students sat alone in a small room at a desk facing a blank wall. When a researcher named an object, the student was asked to name alternative ways to use the object. For example, for the word "button," a person might say "as a doorknob on a dollhouse. The students heard several sets of words and were asked to name as many responses as possible. The participants then repeated the task with different words while walking on a treadmill facing a blank wall in the same room. They found that the students gave more creative responses when walking than when sitting.
An experiment is a test or set of tests performed with the purpose of verifying a hypothesis or inducing it by observing a natural or provoked phenomenon. We can state that the text shown in the question is an experiment as it presents tests being done to confirm the hypothesis that we can develop more creative thoughts when we are walking than when we are sitting.
I can't see the statements so I can't give a definite answer. However, think of it this way: We know the statement needs to add to the idea that insects are dangerous. So you need to chose the option that presents insects in a negative light or gives a specific reason to fear them. A neutral or positive fact about insects would not support the idea.
