Answer:
No because they are both different types of people that want different things
<em>The primary document that offers information about aspects of Colonial culture is;</em>
B. The Great Awakening
<u>The Great Awakening refers to certain periods of religious betterment in American Christian history. </u>
The idea of the political party goes back the First Triumvirate of Rome. Marcus Crassus, Gnaeus Pompeius, and Gaius Julius all came to the realisation that they could cement their political power by forming an alliance. In this case it ended disastrously with Julius invading Rome, Pompeius having to fight him (and losing), and Gaius Julius getting to drop “Gaius” from the common usage of his name and add “Caesar” to the end of it.
Despite the outcome, the idea of creating a political power bloc has remained in any system of government that it can exist in. It allows the members to exercise more power and present a united front. Love them or hate them, it’s easy to find out what a major political party generally stands for.
At our last election, we had a series of independents running locally. Most had no website and no signage up around town. The only information I could find on them was a short write-up in the local paper. The write-ups tended to focus on one issue. For example, one candidate was a former nurse and passionate about protecting the healthcare system. That didn’t tell me how she felt about climate change, education, infrastructure, social policies, or anything else. No, it was way easier to vote for a political party.
Answer:
B. Garvey felt Black people should form their own nation where
they were full citizens, while the NAACP focused on fighting for
equal rights in the United States.
Explanation:
Garvey thought that racial equality was not possible in the United States.
Hope this helps :)
By forming trade blocs United States and other nations primarily cooperate economically
