Answer:
The Correct answer is "Because it supplies a higher quantity of output than a single price monopolist"
Explanation:
A cost segregating monopolist charges distinctive cost to various gathering of shoppers based on their capacity to pay, which empower it to create higher amount than a non-separating monopolist. Since it supplies a higher amount of yield than a solitary value monopolist.
Answer: $1,400,000
Explanation:
The checks to creditors were only mailed out in January so the creditor accounts had not been settled in December.
The goods purchased on December 28 should be included in the accounts payable account.
The goods that were shipped FOB Destination and were not yet delivered at year end will not be accounted for because FOB destination means that Dole will only take ownership when it reaches them.
Accounts payable is therefore:
= 900,000 + 350,000 + 150,000
= $1,400,000
The current market price of the bond is 103% of their par value
What percentage is the bond price compared to its par value?
The market bond convention is to quote the price at which the bond can be bought or sold in the market as a percentage of its par value.
The simple approach is to add a percentage sign to any bond price you are given, which means that 97 price means the bond price is 97% of par value.
In the same vein, 103 price means the quoted price of the bond is 103% of the par value of the bond/
Find a futher guide on bond pricing below:
brainly.com/question/15574519
#SPJ1
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Interest begins accruing on a __<span> cash advance </span>___ the day of the transaction
.As interest is the
<span>money that is paid regularly at a particular rate for the use of money lent
</span>A __<span>posting date</span>___ is when a payment is credited to an account.
its the date at which money is being transected from bank
so correct option is B
hope it helps
