To interpret the theme in a story, a reader should study repeating ideas.
The correct is option B) She had eyes that looked as if they could see a long way into things.
The answer which best describes Mrs. Peters is - she had eyes that looked as if they could see a long way into things.
The first one is directed toward Mrs. Hale, and the others are directed at Mrs. Foster. You may notice this while Mrs. Peters is speaking with the Sheriff.
While the other persons who had been questioned appeared to be in the darkness, Mrs. Peters appeared to be trembling and terrified, as if she knew something that the other people don't know.
Learn more about "A Jury of Her Peers?"
brainly.com/question/16014464
#SPJ4
Correct Question
Which of these best describes Mrs. Peters in "A Jury of Her Peers?"
A) She hated to see things half done.
B) She had eyes that looked as if they could see a long way into things.
C) She used to wear pretty clothes and be lively
D) She was real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid and—fluttery.
It should be noted that Raffaello Sanxio was an Italian painter and also an architect of the High Renaissance.
<h3>
What is a biography?</h3>
A biography simply means the account of the life of an individual that is written by someone else.
Raffaello Sanxio was an Italian painter and also an architect of the High Renaissance. It should be noted that his work was admired for its clarity and ease of composition.
He was born in 1483 to Giovanni Santi and Magia di Nicola. He eventually died in 1520. He died after he got sick of fever.
Learn more about biography on:
brainly.com/question/6066690
The poet described about the kill of the Element is given below.
Explanation:
In the 1920s a young would-be poet, an ex-Etonian named Eric Blair, arrived as a Burma Police recruit and was posted to several places, culminating in Moulmein. Here he was accused of killing a timber company elephant, the chief of police saying he was a disgrace to Eton. Blair resigned while back in England on leave, and published several books under his assumed name, George Orwell.
In 1936 these were followed by what he called a “sketch” describing how, and more importantly why, he had killed a runaway elephant during his time in Moulmein, today known as Mawlamyine. By this time Orwell was highly regarded, and many were reluctant to accept that he had indeed killed an elephant. Six years later, however, a cashiered Burma Police captain named Herbert Robinson published a memoir in which he reported young Eric Blair (whom he called “the poet”) as saying back in the 1920s that he wanted to kill an elephant.
All the same, doubt has persisted among Orwell’s biographers. Neither Bernard Crick nor DJ Taylor believe he killed an elephant, Crick suggesting that he was merely influenced by a fashionable genre that blurred the line between fiction and autobiography.
To me, Orwell’s description of the great creature’s heartbreakingly slow death suggests an acute awareness of wrongdoing, as do his repeated protests: “I had no intention of shooting the elephant… I did not in the least want to shoot him … I did not want to shoot the elephant.” Though Orwell shifts the blame on to the imperialist system, I think the poet did shoot the elephant. But read the sketch and decide for yourself.
The answer is Percy Bysshe Shelley
