Answer:
Variable overhead efficiency variance= $558 favorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Variable overhead 0.60 hours $ 3.10 per hour
Actual output 4,100 units
Actual direct labor-hours 2,280 hours
<u>To calculate the variable overhead efficiency variance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Variable overhead efficiency variance= (Standard Quantity - Actual Quantity)*Standard rate
Variable overhead efficiency variance= (0.6*4,100 - 2,280)*3.10
Variable overhead efficiency variance= $558 favorable
Answer:the opportunity cost of growing another apple tree is 2 orange trees
Explanation:
Opportunity cost represents the value of cost what must be given up toin order to obtain the best alternative.
Here Farmer Brain has 3 acres of land that can support 10 apple threes on each acre, and 30 orange tree on best acre, 20 on good acre and 10 oranges on bad acre.
that means he can grows 30 apples on the 3 acres and 60 oranges at on the 3 acres. giving us
the opportunity cost of growing an orange tree is
60 oranges ( 30+20+10)trees= 30 apples tress
1 orange tree = 30/60
1 orange tree=1/2 apples
therefore the opportunity cost of growing an orange tree is half apple tree, Also the opportunity cost of growing an apple tree is 2 orange trees
Answer:
The answer is D) aggregation
Explanation:
An aggregate forecast addresses a company's capacity requirements
Answer:
B) the uneven distribution of gains and losses from free trade.
Explanation:
One of the most important reasons why governments impose trade barriers is to protect domestic jobs (and domestic industries). We are part of a society (country), and society's most important component is people, not money. Generally the economic gains of free trade are larger than the economic losses, but the economic losses hurt the most.
Imagine if no trade barriers actually existed, how many millions of jobs would be lost in the US. Trade barriers are nothing new, the current president didn't invent them. He just incinerated them.
How does a leader tell the people that 10 or 20 million must lose their jobs and probably will not be able to find any similar jobs in the future just because the rest of society will benefit from cheaper products. The lives of 20 million households (50-80 million people) would be destroyed, while 280 million people would benefit.
The amount of harm done to the people that lose their jobs is much greater than any individual benefit.
Answer:
(a) Work/leisure choice
(b) Marketing strategy
Explanation:
Microeconomic issues relate to those that are within the scope and power of individuals, households and firms which means that problems here will relate to decisions that these participants make in relation to resource allocation.
Choices relating to leisure or work have to do with the individual and the resources they would need or derive from either work or leisure and so are a microeconomic problem.
The marketing strategy that a firm should pursue is related to an individual firm and so is a microeconomic problem as well.
