All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
All you need to do is translate in or ask your library for help
Kennedy’s biggest goal in foreign policy was to avoid war
Answer:
I think it would be rhetorical appeals. I think this because as you read a book you want something to try to figure out and that is what a rhetorical appeal does. It makes an argument more persuasive than that of an argument that had no rhetorical appeals.
Explanation:
