The Greek view of history would be more like watching a parade from a balcony. There is a progression of events (items in the parade), and the view of the historian is as one who observes and recounts what he sees. The Greeks viewed all world history as cyclical -- so maybe imagine the "parade" as one that keeps following a circular path. Maybe new participants take over for previous participants, but history goes on, without having a final outcome.
The Hebrew view of history, which transferred also then into the Christian view of history, is that all events of history have a purpose under God's governance. But we can't always see that purpose or understand exactly what God is doing through the course of history. So our view of history is more like watching a parade from behind a fence. We can see some things as we peek through the cracks, as it were. But we never get a full view of all that God is doing or where the "parade" of history ultimately will end.
Some were for it and some where against it
Answer:
Well I think ( I am a Christian) the crusades were effective.
Explanation:
this is because many people converted to Christian. today many countries feel threaten by Christians and closed their country to missionaries. the effect on even Muslim states had some change! To the other Christians, this was a wake call to get active and spread the word! god bless.
The Byzantine Empire differed from the Western Empire because while the Western Empire had two figures of authority, (political and religious) the Byzantine Empire had one.
I believe the answer is: Wolves could control the increasing elk population
At that time, the increasing elk population became a trouble for Local Farmers because they eat and destroy the farmers' crops which cause many financial expense for them. Because of this, biologist introduced wolves as the elk's natural predator to reduce elk's population.
