Answer:
Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.
The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.
The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union.
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>The correct option is d) someone with savant syndrome.</em>
Explanation:
Savant syndrome can be described as a condition in which a person who has mental disabilities is seen to be excellent or above average in certain other activities. Generally,people with savant syndrome have known to have excellent memory. For example, such people can be excellent in calculation or music abilities.
As the scenario in the question depicts, Alexandra is mentally handicapped but excellent in music abilities. Hence, she is having savant syndrome.
Before the unification of Nepal was badly running, without good political issues and visions. Nepal faced domestic war and conflict, most of the people died.
Prior to the unification of Nepal, Nepal consisted of small kingdoms, and Darbar Square is the most prominent remnant of these ancient kingdoms of Nepal.
Answer:
The case will be continued because Al has a right to be informed of the accusation against him. so Answer is The case will be continued because Al will have a lawyer find his own witnesses.
