The word desert is often used metaphorically to describe a deprived environment, as a desert is deprived of water. Thus from Gao Village: A Portrait of Rural Life in Modern China by M C F Gao:
High desertion rates in any company, battalion, or division indicated failures of command and logistics, for which blame pointed to leaders as much as to the men who deserted. Some soldiers deserted when all the other members of their units had been killed and their own deaths appeared inevitable.
Yw and pls mark me brainiest
No, this statement is false. According to Schaie and his colleagues' longitudinal studies, meaningful cognitive impairment does not show up until the age of 60.
At what age does cognitive decline start?
According to a study that was just published on bmj.com, cognitive function, which refers to the brain's memory, reasoning, and comprehension abilities, can begin to decline as early as age 45.
What kind of study is a longitudinal study?
Studies that track specific individuals over an extended period—often years or decades—use continuous or recurring measures.
Why is longitudinal research important?
Researchers can study dynamic ideas rather than static ones using longitudinal data. Knowing how people transition from one circumstance to another is crucial (for example, through work, poverty, parenthood, ill health, and so on). the relationship between early circumstances in life and subsequent results.
Learn more about longitudinal research: brainly.com/question/13045209
#SPJ4
Answer:
The 10 provisions of the Treaty of Paris included 1: The king acknowledged the United States to be free, sovereign and and independent states. He promised to treat them as such and that his heirs would treat them as such as well, 2: To prevent future dispute about where is America and what belongs to the British, boundaries were marked, set, and described in the treaty, 3: It is agreed that the United States citizens may fish in the seas where they please, for whatever kind of fish they please, in British and United States territory, 4: Neither Britain nor the United States would do anything to prevent the collection of debt by lawful creditors in either country, 5: British subjects and loyalists who had property confiscated during the war would have it returned or be reimbursed for it, 6: No one would be persecuted or suffer anymore loss due to the war or the side he had chosen. Any currently in prison over such charges would be immediately released, 7: All prisoners of war on both sides were to be released. The king promised to withdraw all his armies from America without taking anything from the American citizens. and all property taken during the war would be returned, 8: The navigation of the Mississippi river would be free to both the British and the Americans “for ever," 9: If any land were taken by the British or the Americans before the treaty reached the United States, such holdings would be returned without problem and without compensation, and lastly 10: Both parties promised to ratify the treaty within six months, or sooner if possible. The terms of the Treaty of Paris was that the British agreed to recognize American independence as far west as the Mississippi River. The Americans also agreed to honor debts owed to British merchants from before the war and to stop persecuting British Loyalists.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! Not my best work but ya
Answer:
C Inadmissible, because it is extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement on a collateral matter.
Explanation:
A defendant is on trial for robbing a liquor store. The store clerk testified that the defendant came into the store at about 11 p.m., pointed a black gun with a silver grip at him, and demanded that he give him all the money in the cash register. The clerk testified that the store was well lit and that the defendant was not wearing a mask. The defendant's attorney called the clerk's employer to testify that when the clerk gave her a report of the robbery, he told her that the defendant pointed a silver gun with a black grip at him.
How should the trial judge rule on the admissibility of this testimony?
The evidence should not be accepted by the Judge. if the the earlier statement is contrary, it is not a enough to dismiss the witness.(A) and (B) are incorrect because, The clerk may be reliable or not. The evidence she provided is not enough to prosecute the defendant. she might not be totally correct in the reporting of the situation and might leave the judge confused. (D) is not correct
When we develop a routine in out daily behavior. open attention to the present.
