The correct answer is B. Negotiating a treaty with Mexico.
Explanation
Foreign policy is the name by which the decisions and actions taken by a State are known to favor the national and international interests of the countries involved. In short, foreign policy groups the agreements, negotiations, and decisions of two or more nations to establish economic, political, and social relations. So if a country like the United States establishes negotiations for a treaty with Mexico, it would be a matter of foreign policy because it involves the interests of two countries and their needs and interests. According to the above, the correct answer is B. Negotiating a treaty with Mexico.
<span>Logging ranks among the top causes of deforestation in Central and South America, especially because of the high demand for timber in countries importing from the region. In fact, between 1990 and 2010, South America lost about 8.7% of its forest cover, and over 80% of Latin America's tropical species have been lost just within the past 40 years. For the second human factor affecting the environment of Central and South America, according to the World Bank, more than 70% of water used in Central and South America empties back into rivers in the region without undergoing any form of treatment. This implies that industrial and sewage waste flow back into rivers, lakes, dams, and other water sources. This is so endemic in the region that every one in eight people there doesn't have access to clean drinking water.</span>
Answer: The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached among state delegates during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. Delegates disputed whether and how slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population, as this population number would determine a state's number of seats in the House of Representatives and how much it would pay in taxes. The compromise counted three out of every five slaves as people, giving the Southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignored, but fewer than if slaves and free people had been counted equally.
Explanation:
