Answer:
2. If we had the money, we'd buy a beautiful house in...
(we'd is short for, we would).
3. Lisa will have a lot of fun when she goes to Germany...
4. Unless they reduce the price, they'll never....
5. If I were you, I'll take the dress back to the shop.
6. Annabel will look for a job as soon as she finishes her...
7. If it gets so windy,...
8. If you found some extra money...
9. You'll never finish...
10. Sarah will be...
Explanation:
First conditional statements refer to future events that have a high possibility of occurring. For example, in the sentence, "Glory<em> will cook the food"</em>, there is a high possibility to the fact that this event will occur.
Second conditionals are used in sentences where the possibility of the event happening is very low. For example in the statement, "<em>I'd leap for joy if I found a bag full of money in the bush"</em>. Even though things like this happen, their chances of happening is quite low.
The rhetorical device is used in the given sentence is, chiasmus.
Because A rhetorical device is a strategy used by authors or speakers to persuade readers or listeners to evaluate an issue from a particular perspective. It involves employing language that is intended to stimulate an emotive presentation of a particular perspective or action. Through the use of language, rhetorical devices can elicit an emotional response in the audience, although that is not their main goal.
Chiasmus, also known as chiasm, is the "reversal of grammatical structures in successive phrases or clauses - but no repetition of words" in rhetoric. The chiasmus has an effect. In addition to helping you communicate more with less, it draws attention to notions or ideas that are frequently used but contradict each other. With such a limited language, it serves as a "catchphrase" and catches the substance of a statement.
To know more about chiasmus:
brainly.com/question/2054931
#SPJ4
This is a question of morals and ethics, and the answer will depend on your own personal, subjective opinions.
On one hand, some people would say that we should experiment as much as we can - going to such lengths where the modification through genetic engineering will allow us to create new humans based on our wants and needs. We will be able to choose our baby's eye color, hair color, everything we might want to do will be possible, and for some people, that is a welcome future.
However, on the other hand, there is also a large number of people who are against such modifications, primarily because it is immoral and 'against God.' In their opinion, we are playing God, doing what we were not supposed to do, and therefore will have to pay the price.
It all depends on how you look at the subject - it is quite personal.
Answer:
The brothers build three different houses.
Explanation:
Now they don't have to share a house.
