Answer: Non-destructive
Explanation:
Non-destructive means it has no effect on disrupting the work. This is what Carl Rogers's person-centered approach is considered on.
Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
Answer:
-lack of clarity and consistency of national objectives and standards.
-complex and inflexible approval processes.
Answer:
Conflict happens when two parties contradict or collide on a single interest. The terms related to conflict are very different in meaning.
*Conflict Avoidance: When the parties avoid a predestined conflict with some resolution, it becomes a conflic avoidance situation.
*Conflict Confrontation: When the parties or one of them face the conflict with or without proper reason to develop a mutual resolution.
*Conflict Resolution: The ideas that must discard the whole conflict is the resolution. The parties in a conflict needs to come to a mutual resolution to end the conflict in a peaceful way.
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
Physical weathering and this isnt social studies add this to science
