Answer:
The beliefs of early Romans were animistic in nature. They believed they were watched over by the ancestors. After Roman adoption of Greek mythology and gods and the absorption of Hellenistic culture, the worship of those gods (with changed games) was a public and official practice. Roman religiousness was not based on the search for divine grace but on mutual trust of god and man. Roman religion was aimed at securing cooperation, benevolence and peace from the gods (the so-called pax deorum).
Explanation:
They formed a government, wrote a constitution, and adopted some white ways.
The totalitarian states usually don't allow any opposition parties to exist. If some people try to form a party, they usually end up in prison, are banished from the nation, or even murdered.
The reason why the totalitarian rulers prefer a one party system is in order to have all the power in the country, without having opposition that will constantly go public about the terrors and injustices that are happening. If there are more parties, than the people will start to support them, especially cause rarely who likes to live under a totalitarian ruler, thus the totalitarian ruler will face a situation where he/she will lose its power.
There is no key difference in both case because the Supreme court ruled against discrimination against the blacks.
<h3>What happened in Plessy V Ferguson?</h3>
The ruling of the Supreme court in the cases of Plessy v. Ferguson upheld the Louisiana state law allowed for "equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored race"
<h3>What happened in Brown v. Board of Education?</h3>
The ruling of the Supreme court in the cases Brown v. Board of Education favored Oliver Brown whose daughter was not allowed to attend a school near her home due to discriminate against the black students.
In conclusion, there is no key difference in both case because the Supreme court ruled against discrimination against the blacks.
Read more about blacks discrimination
<em>brainly.com/question/13608616</em>
<span>The Indian villages much more than its towns and cities depend directly or indirectly on the earth s natural resources. The Indian rural sector has high population density and high level of poverty which turns out to be a serious threat to the environment. The village ecosystem On account of its distinctive features villages in India can be considered as an ecosystem. The village ecosystem depends for its functioning on the major bio-productive systems such as agricultural lands grasslands forest and wetland which together form important physical resource base. The practice of using non-renewable energy is very low in Indian villages. Agriculture is mostly based on human and animal labour instead of oil and electricity. Tractor is used in some areas for tilling the land. Human and animal power is even used for lifting ground water. Local energy sources such as biogas solar energy firewood and dung are mainly used for cooking. Earlier these practices didn t cause much damage to the environment. But today rapidly increasing population and greater volumes of trade have led to the introduction of environmentally-damaging products like plastics and chemical pesticides. These are having an adverse impact on the environment. Lack of education and awareness is also contributing to the problem.</span>
