1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Snezhnost [94]
3 years ago
13

Leader of the Roundheads in the 1 Civil War

History
1 answer:
Nuetrik [128]3 years ago
4 0
Oliver Cromwell - leader of the round heads in the civil war :) 
You might be interested in
One reason why Galileo was a heretic person
pentagon [3]
Since he lived in a theocratic government, he was tried by the Holy Office for teaching that the Earth revolves around the Sun which was deemed a heretic by the Catholic Church.
5 0
2 years ago
During world war 1 buying war bonds was a way for people to
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
Support troops with paying for supplies
7 0
3 years ago
Anyone good at history and writing songs???
Korvikt [17]
I'm alright at history and I did write songs when I was in 6th grade in private school but it was a parody. Occasionally I've written simple songs in keystone which is an online school
4 0
2 years ago
The Great Pyramid of Giza is located in what Egyptian city?
leva [86]
Cairo hope that this. Helped you :))
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the Scott v. Stanford case the Supreme Court
MakcuM [25]

Answer:

Explanation:Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them. The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Columbian Exchange create economic opportunities for Europeans?
    13·1 answer
  • What party was founded when the free-soil party joined forces with the northern whigs and others\?
    8·1 answer
  • what was lucky for the United State during the attack and what impact did it have on the rest of the war?
    8·1 answer
  • The Constitution had to be Rewritten after the Civil War to include emancipation true or false?
    7·1 answer
  • How did New York City represent the spirit of the nation in 1790
    7·1 answer
  • Theodore Roosevelt did not serve in the military during the Spanish- American War due to medical issues.
    14·1 answer
  • What social changes resulted from U.S. involvement in World War II?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was true about the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II?
    14·2 answers
  • two waves are traveling through a tube. wave x has an amplitude of 1 cm, and wave y has twice the amplitude of wave x. the energ
    7·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!