Answer:
requiring citizens to obey all commands and laws imposed by the government without question
requiring citizens to set aside a portion of their property for the exclusive use of the government
Explanation:
In the 1800s, there was a school of thought then that focused on the reasoning of man and how logic and rationality is the driving force and main source of authority and clamored for ideals such as being tolerant, compassionate, obedience to constitutional authority within reason, et cetera. This movement was known as The Enlightenment.
Therefore, according to the principles of The Enlightenment, the following would be inappropriate requiring citizens to obey all commands and laws imposed by the government without question and requiring citizens to set aside a portion of their property for the exclusive use of the government because these actions are not rational.
<span>Sources of law in the USA are United States Constitution, state conditions, federal/state statues, common, case and administrative law. </span>
The rulers of the Soviet Union viewed empire and imperialism in ideological terms as ‘the highest and final stage of capitalism’.1 By this Leninist definition, the Soviet Union did not identify itself as an empire, and instead, its leaders vehemently denounced imperialism that was carried out by its enemies and competitors: the capitalist states. Despite its own anguish over being identified as an empire, the Soviet Union indeed was one. While the meaning of ‘empire’ has shifted over time, for the purposes of this paper the definition of empire is in the sense of a great power, a polity, ruling over vast territories and people, leaving a significant impact on the history of world civilizations.2 As the characteristics of the Soviet Union are examined, support for viewing the USSR as an empire grows.
The Soviet Union emerged after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The Tsarist Russian Empire’s government was overthrown by the local soviets, led by the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks attempted to replace the Russian empire with a communist one, in which socialism would make nationalismobsolete and in place there would be a supra-national imperial ideology.3 Still, coming back to the issue of ‘empire’, the Soviet Union clearly maintained a commanding control over multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic societies that surpassed the extent of the preceding Imperial Russia Empire. A question thus arises: was the USSR a Russian empire? The first aspect to consider is if the USSR was a continuation of Russian imperialist power or if an intrinsic distinction can be made between the two. What is notable to address is what is meant by ‘Russian’ identity and nationality, its formation, and reshaping through time. Once this will be accounted for, this paper will move on with an answer to the question: the USSR was indeed an essentially different empire from the one preceding it, and thus, the USSR was not a Russian empire.
Answer:
SAME BRO I AM SOO HAPPY TO BE OUT
Explanation:
