The problem is missing the main question.
The main question is: what is the probability that at least
six taxpayers in a sample of 8 say that it is very significant to safeguard
that high-income tax payers do not swindle on their tax returns? Use the
binomial distribution probability function.
Solution:
Let X be the number of taxpayers say that it is very significant
to safeguard that high-income tax payers do not swindle on their tax returns.
X ~ (n = 8, p = 0.82)
P (at least six taxpayers)
= P (X ≥ 6)
= 1 – P(X ≤ 5)
= 1 – 0.1608
= 0.8392 is the answer
The primary goal of transnational corporations is to offer their
services or products across other culture. These corporations usually provided
loans to the poorest countries and invest in then in return. Foreign investments
create more jobs which help the economy and the people to improve the quality
of their lives.
Answer:
The proper adjusting entry on December 31 is, D. Debit Insurance Expense, $4,700; credit Prepaid Insurance, $4,700.
Explanation:
The entry of prepaid insurance made earlier was $8,150 and on December 31, it was calculated that the unexpired amount of insurance was $3,450. So first we will calculate the amount of prepaid insurance which has been expired,
$8,150 - $3,450 = $4,700
To record the expired prepaid insurance, we will first debit prepaid insurance expense with $4,700 and then credit prepaid insurance with $4,700.
Prepaid Insurance is an asset and it will decrease by a credit of $4,700, so that the remaining balance in prepaid insurance account is $3,450 which is the remaining unexpired prepaid insurance.
Answer: Tangible: <em>cash, inventory, vehicles, equipment, buildings and investments</em>
Intangible: <em>goodwill, brand recognition, copyrights, patents, trademarks, trade names, and customer lists</em>
<em>Hope this helps </em>
<em>Plz mark brainlest</em>
<em />
Components inc., a maker of vehicle parts, refuses to sell to diy repair inc., a national vehicle service firm. the maker convinces the engine parts company, a competitor, to do the same. this is a group boycott.
Under competition law, a group boycott is a type of secondary boycott, unless two or more competitors in the relevant market agree to deal with an actual or potential competitor of the boycotting firm. Refuse to do business with the company.
Example: The FTC challenged the actions of several groups of competing health care providers, such as physicians, and refused to do business with insurance companies or other purchasers on terms other than those mutually agreed upon. That amounted to a group boycott of the illegal group.
Learn more about group boycott here: brainly.com/question/13894564
#SPJ4