Answer:
1. The great depression
2.The lack of democratic traditions
Explanation:
This question dwells intensively upon the causes of World War 2. Several nations took an aggressive position in world politics, based on an authoritarian style of Government.
Italy became Fascist
Japan became an Absolute Monarchy
Germany became Nazi.
Russia became Communist.
The Great Depression (felt worldwide) had radicalized these nations. Without experience, the authoritarians skillfully blamed the Democratic Institutions for the Great Depression. On the chance that this was true, these nations turned back in time to the most successful model. of government that they knew.
In short, I see two main causes for authoritarianism in the 1930;s.
The Great Depression
The lack of Democratic traditions in that nation upon which to build.
Answer:It directs human actions so that a person can transcend his animal instincts and human inclinations. A person's conscience is rightly considered sacred because conscience allows man to exercise reason, which is a spark of divine intelligence. ... Without conscience a person would doubt even the smallest decisions.
Explanation:
So, Dr. Faustus is an embodiment of curiosity gone wild. His blase attitude towards humanistic science is, however, some kind of a scientific decadence: he casts away philosophy and law, to embrace magic, as a relic of medieval obsession over mysticism. In this regard, he is a subversion of the Renaissance Man. He thinks he has already learned all there was to learn about this world, so now he yearns for another kind of knowledge - esoteric, otherworldly, knowledge that isn't exactly a knowledge because you don't have to study long and hard for it, you just have to sell your soul to Lucifer.
Answer:
Hi myself Shrushtee.
Explanation:
There is currently a debate about traditional letter grading vs standards-based grading in schools. Think about BOTH sides of
the debate. Should students be graded using the traditional letter grading system? Write an argumentative essay in your own
please mark me as brainleist
Answer:
In the next two lines, that seems to refer to the statement above about the second path being grassier and less worn. Now the speaker suggests that the second path was equally, not less, worn: “the passing there / Had worn them about the same.” This seems to say that the two paths had had a similar number of people walking on them, so they were fairly equally worn.
Explanation:
