Answer: The difference between the two economist are "differences in perception versus reality". That means option B is most correct.
Explanation: The difference in their perception versus reality, means how their want to interpret things against how things really are.
Harry interpret his understanding, that the way people save their house hold is becoming lower than what it use to be, to improve the standard of living. Though he doesn't believe consumption of household product is the factor to be controlled to achieve an improvement in the standard of living. While Edison interprets his that, if tax is applied more in consumption, it will help reduce the rate of consumption of households products, which will help them to save more, thereby increasing their standard of living.
Harry views household consumption as a real factor of standard of living that has been affected due to a cause. While Edison views household consumption as the real cause, which has to be worked on, to achieve a growth in standard of living.
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Well not only do humans and animals evolve plants do too.DNA changes over time which changes not only the appearance but the way the plant acts and protects itself .there for the black leave was from a different leave thats DNA changed over time and it reacted to the crops grown by farmers and accelerated the growth hormones in the plant.
<u>The Other Answer Listed Is Incorrect.</u>
The CORRECT answer is:
<em>B) </em>Primary industries produce raw products while secondary industries create manufacturing jobs.
I had the question on my assignment and got it right!
Have an Amazing day :)
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima is recognized as a right decision by America for many. Had the bomb not been dropped, the war would have prolonged on, but dropping the bomb cost many lives in Japan and almost destroyed the country. Though the act is considered justifiable for saving lives, it actually destroyed as much as it saved. A surrender would definitely have occurred eventually, if maybe a little later than sooner. But the bomb had been unnecessary. Japan suffered consequences for decades. Besides, the action was not only inhumane, but also racially motivated. For listed reasons, I believe the dropping of the atomic bomb was not quite the right thing to do even though many would argue otherwise
