Hi there!
We know that the snail lives 1 x 1/2 feet in 3 x 3/4 hours. First you have to simplify or solve the expressions. 1 x 1/2 is equal to 1/2 and 3 x 3/4 is 9/4 or 2.25 in decimal form.
You need to divide 2.25 by 1/2 or 0.5 which is 4.5.
So the snail moves 4.5 or 9/2 feet per hour.
Hope this helps !
210 pieces
Step-by-step explanation:
First, you need to figure out how many pieces a single machine can cut in a minute, so you need to divide 105 by 3, which gets you 35 pieces per minute.
Next, since we know there are 6 machines, and one machine canncut 35 pieces per minute, we can the figure out how many pieces all 6 cutting machines can cut in 1 minute. You would do this by making an equation such as this:
The x represents the total number of pieces cut by all 6 machines in one minute.
Next, since we now have an equation, we can go ahead and solve it. We would multiply 35 by 6, which would get us 210 pieces per minute that can be cut by all six machines
Option C
The football team had a overall loss of 2 yards
<em><u>Solution:</u></em>
When the team gains yards we use a positive value, and when the team loses yards we use a negative value.
<em><u>Given that, football team gains 2 yards on the first play</u></em>
First play = +2
<em><u>Given that football team loses 5 yards on the second play</u></em>
Second play = -5
<em><u>Given that football team loses 3 yards on the third play</u></em>
Third play = -3
<em><u>Given that football team gains 4 yards on the fourth play</u></em>
Fourth play = +4
Put the yards from four plays together, we get
⇒ 2 -5 -3 + 4
Let us simplify
⇒ -3 -3 + 4 = -6 + 4 = -2
So, -2 represents loss of two yards (since negative value indicates loss)
72,491 + 19,326 = 91,817
Leah scored 91,817 points
Answer:
C. volume
Step-by-step explanation:
The response variable in this scenario would be the volume of the usable lumber. That is because this variable depends completely on the height of the cherry trees that are being measured. The higher that the cherry trees are the more volume can be expected to get from cutting these trees down. The opposite goes for trees that are smaller, they would decrease the total expected volume that will be received from the usable lumber since there would be less amount of tree to cut down.
