Answer:
Yes, almost any device is if you use it for educational purposes.
Explanation:
Answer:
Human trafficking is not just a heinous crime. On top of being a disgusting criminal activity, it's also violating the rights of human beings in general. It's an outright atrocious violation of the human rights. The people who get trafficked are treated like worthless items by the traffickers. The traffickers trample all over the victims as if they are animals. They make their decisions for them, give them no respect whatsoever, don't let them move freely, and lastly, they don't let the victim choose who they can work for and where they can work at etc. In human trafficking, activities such as child labor, sexual exploitation of minors as well as legals, forced labor, forced bondage as well as marriage take place; these acts are the violation of human rights per se. All the previously mentioned acts and practices are prohibited by the International Law of Human Rights.
Answer:
She brought the hurricane victims so the listeners would hear their stories from their perspective.
Explanation:
Cheryl Corley was aware that describing the experiences the victims of the hurricane had from a third person perspective would not accurately convey the horrors the victims experienced so she had to include the interviews of the victims themselves so listeners would better the experience from the first person perspective.
When a story is being narrated in the third person narrative, that is another person describing events from a detached view the emotions are not properly captured and the 0erson simply describes it the way he sees it or thinks it happened. It is not an accurate way of describing events.
When narrating an experience in the first person, the person describes it exactly how it happened to them and how they felt when it was happening and how they felt after the event. It is a description based on the descriptor's experience.
I believe it's the first sentence.
{In disjointed sentences, the cook and the correspondent argued to the difference between a life-saving station and a house of refuge.}
