Answer:
Explanation:
The Monroe Doctrine, established by President James Monroe in colonization in Latin America, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams argued that joining forces with the British could limit future U.S. opportunities for expansion, and that it clearly did not have the military or naval power to back up its.
plz mark as brainliest
It was <span>through the </span><span>land lottery system that land was distributed among Georgia residents.
The Yazoo land fraud was a standout amongst the most critical events in the post– Revolutionary War (1775-83) history of Georgia. The Yazoo offer of 1795 did much to shape Georgia legislative issues and to strain relations with the national government for ages. Georgia's western land is referred to as </span><span>the "Yazoo lands" </span>
Answer: The Grocery store is the defendant
Explanation: A defendant is someone, company or an organisation being sued or accused of comiting a crime and is charged to court to defend his or herself, in the case of an organization or company being charged to court needs to defend and absorb itself of all crime.
In the case of Adrianna, the grocery store being the defendant needs to defend itself in court against Adrianna's claims and prove that it's not guilty of her claims. If found guilty the grocery store will pay for damages, her hospital bills and injuries the fall might have caused.
Answer:
The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was called to revise the ailing Articles of Confederation. However, the Convention soon abandoned the Articles, drafting a new Constitution with a much stronger national government. Nine states had to approve the Constitution before it could go into effect.
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
