Question Completion:
Matrix payoff:
Sharon
Left Right
Paolo Left 8, 3 4, 4
Right 5, 3 5, 4
Answer:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for ___Paolo______ to choose ____Right______.
The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Paolo chooses ____Right______ and Sharon chooses __ Right_____.
Explanation:
a) Paolo's dominant strategy is the strategy that always provides the greater utility to Paolo, no matter what Sharon's strategy is. In this case, the dominant strategy for Paolo is to choose RIGHT always.
b) The Nash Equilibrium concept determines the optimal solution in a non-cooperative game in which each player (e.g. Paolo and Sharon) lacks any incentive to change their initial strategies. This implies that each player can achieve their desired outcomes by not deviating from their initial strategies since each player's strategy is optimal when considering the decisions of the other player.
Answer:
Facts of the case:
A client of a staffing company has hired the employees to conduct its business activities. The workers are hired, paid and offered with other benefits by the firm. The firm also supervises the employees and provides necessary inputs to accomplish the job. The client has right to direct the staffing firm workers to perform the task according to their needs. However this right is not frequently exercised by the client.
An employer has an accessibility to hire or procure the human asset in direct or indirect manner in the present case, it the indirect hiring of the employee through staffing firm.
When an employee work for a staffing company, he or she gets paid and provided with a right to complain about the client regarding its manner of possessing clients, unethical contractual salaries etc.
In the present scenario, it not clear whether the employee is hired on contractual basis. If the employees are hired for contractual basis, the staffing firm would be the employer of the workers in the case of terminating them. If the employees were hired for permanent position, then the employees were terminated by the client itself as the client would be the employer of workers.
The answer is 5,000bdbrbgvtvdhdudidjrbrbfbtbfjf
Answer:
Right agent.
Explanation:
A rights agent is said to be a correlative junction, serve and also seen to be an obedient mediator and right assistance between his client and any form of third party organisation or also other clients. A right agent is sometimes seen to be reliable to a principal when he/she acts without actual authority, but with apparent authority. He is also held responsible for indemnify and also principal loss or damage resulting from his/her act. He is also keen and careful in his advise and dealing on behalf of his client is he owes certain contractual duties to his/her agent as he protect him also from wrong claims, expenses that are not worthwhile, liabilities etc.
To ensure bandwidth isn’t being consumed to ensure bandwidth isn’t being consumed has to use an application container
.
<u>
Explanation:</u>
Application container separates applications from the host operating system. Virtual environments are allowed to run application in application container. Software-defined networking (SDN), will not complete the task on the other hand.
Running applications on separate virtual LANs (VLANs) is of no use when it comes to the host operating system and notifying on updated versions can also not accomplish the task.
Application container is an all-in-one or stand-alone package for software application. They include application binaries, software dependencies and the hardware requirements that are required to run, all enclosed into an independent, self-contained unit.