The Code of Hammurabi is a well-preserved Babylonian code of law of ancient Mesopotamia, dating back to about 1754 BC (Middle Chronology). It is one of the oldest deciphered writings of significant length in the world. The sixth Babylonian king, Hammurabi, enacted the code, and partial copies exist on a 2.25 metre (7.5 ft) stone stele and consists of 282 laws, with scaled punishments, adjusting "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" (lex talionis)[1] as graded depending on social status, of slave versus free man or woman.[2]
Among the many accomplishments of the First Emperor, the one that persisted into the Han dynasty would be the "<span>a. Formation of administrative districts," since this proved to be a highly successful administrative tactic. </span>
Hello. You did not present the battles to which this question refers, nor did you present any text where we could look for an answer. This makes it impossible for your question to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
To assess which battle had the most balanced number of soldiers on both sides, you need to know the number of soldiers, in each army, that was participating in the conflict. The battle that has the most balanced number, in this case, is the one where the two armies have a very close number of soldiers, or the same number. For example, if in a battle between Army A and Army B, Army A has 1000 soldiers and Army B has 300 soldiers, that battle has an imbalance in relation to the number of soldiers. However, if Army A has 1000 soldiers and Army B has 920 soldiers, we can consider that this battle is in balance, since the number of soldiers in each army is similar and each army will be able to attack and defend at similar intensities.
Answer: music
Explanation: everywhere you go there's music playing in a five mile radius
It would be "<span>Appointing judges can appear corrupt as the executive seeks those with similar ideology</span>" that supports this type of system, since this implies that it is unfair to have an executive such as a president appoint justices.
