Answer:
business, management, and administration cluster
Explanation:
Business Management and Administration Career Cluster emphases on careers in planning, organizing, directing, and evaluating business functions.
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Based on the various activities for the month that were reflected in your checkbook, your new balance would be $135.84.
<h3>What is the checkbook balance?</h3>
This can be found as:
= Opening balance + Deposits - Checks and withdrawals
Solving gives:
= 134.56 + 345.12 - 32.19 - 250 - 16.65 - 45
= $135.84
In conclusion, your new balance is $135.84.
Find out more on checkbook balances at brainly.com/question/3719189
#SPJ1