1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveta [45]
3 years ago
5

Waxwania is producing $550 of real gdp, whereas the potential real gdp (or full-employment real gdp) is $650. how large is its b

udget deficit?
Business
2 answers:
tekilochka [14]3 years ago
7 0
There seems to be an error in your question. Budget deficit is when the government spending exceeds its revenue, yet your question makes no mention of expenses. However, it seems to be referring to something we call the "negative output gap", where actual output is lower than potential output. If this is the case, then the output gap is $100. (I suspect you omitted the million as no country, not even fictional, only produces $500.)
Musya8 [376]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is $100

Explanation:

With the data we have at our disposal on Waxwania, we can analyze that if the real GDP is $550, which would be the level of real production, that is, what it produced; and knowing that the real potential GDP is $650, that is, the level of production that the economy can reach with the efficient use of production factors, we can see that this economy is functioning at a lower level than it could. Therefore we can say that the budget deficit is $100.

Have a nice day!

You might be interested in
The table below presents the average and marginal cost of producing cheeseburgers per hour at a roadside diner.
Butoxors [25]

Answer:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> falling </u>and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is <u>rising</u>.

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is <u>  rising </u> and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <u>at a minimum</u>.

Explanation:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> </u><em><u>falling </u></em>and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is <em><u>rising</u></em>.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average total cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> falling.</u>

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the marginal cost of production is<u> rising.</u>

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is <u> </u><em><u> rising</u></em><u> </u> and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <em><u>at a minimum</u></em>.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 70 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is<u> rising.</u>

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of cheeseburger production at quantities of 50 and 60 cheeseburgers per hour are equal and the lowest on the table, this implies that the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <u>at a minimum</u> at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour.

7 0
2 years ago
Midyear on July 31st, the Chester Corporation's balance sheet reported:
erastova [34]

Answer:

$76.856 million

Explanation:

As we know that Balance sheet is divided in two portions.

1. Total Assets (Current Assets + Fixed Assets)

2. Total Liabilities and Share Holders' Equity.

and they both should be equal. So we can write from the above information, as:

Total Assets = Total Liabilities + Total Common Stock + Retained Earnings

N.B. We are excluding Cash from our calculation cause we assume that Cash is already been included in Total Assets.

Hence, by putting the values in above equation we can find our Retained Earnings as:

Retained Earnings + $128.230 million + $6.350 million = $211.436 million

Retained Earnings + $134.58 million = $211.436 million

Retained Earnings = $211.436 million - $134.58 million

Retained Earnings = $76.856 million

6 0
2 years ago
What explanation might an economist provide why some people overeat when such behavior can lead to health​ consequences? Some pe
LiRa [457]

Answer:

Utility overvalued

Explanation:

According to economists, such people over value the utility they are meant to get in the future. They only want to get the entire satisfaction at a go because of the fear of not getting that food again in the nearest future.

3 0
3 years ago
On January 2, 2009, L Co. issued at par $20,000 of 4% bonds convertible in total into 1,000 shares of L's common stock. No bonds
MrRissso [65]

Answer:

The correct answer is $1.2 per share.

Explanation:

According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:

Interest expense of Bonds = $20,000 × 4% = $800

Now, Interest expense of Bond, After tax = $800 × ( 1 - 50%) = $800 × 0.50

= $400

So, we can calculate the diluted earning by using following formula:

Diluted Earning = (Net income + Interest expense after tax) ÷ Total outstanding shares outstanding

Where, Total outstanding shares = 1,000 shares + 1,000 shares = 2,000 shares

By putting the value, we get

Diluted earning = ($2000 + $400 ) ÷ 2,000

= $1.2 per share

4 0
2 years ago
Question 3
lozanna [386]

Answer:

OD All are signs of a serious gambling problem.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Abc company was originally divided into separate units based on function. last year, abc company expanded into several new geogr
    10·2 answers
  • Clint wants to write a proposal to update computer software. He knows his manager is not very familiar with technology or intere
    6·2 answers
  • A manufacturing company that produces a single product has provided the following data concerning its most recent month of opera
    13·1 answer
  • Using scenarios to help recognize outcomes and plan better falls under the critical thinking idea of
    7·1 answer
  • The Rogers Corporation has a gross profit of $746,000 and $305,000 in depreciation expense. The Evans Corporation also has $746,
    8·1 answer
  • The money supply, m, is the total value of all the cash and checking account balances in an economy. it is determined by the val
    5·1 answer
  • ​Smokey's Sandwich Shoppe paid​ $3,000 for a 2minusyear insurance policy on March​ 1, 2018. The accountant forgot to make any ad
    9·1 answer
  • The Guitar Shoppe reports the following sales forecast: August, $110,000; September, $190,000. Total sales includes 30% cash sal
    12·1 answer
  • What does purchasing insurance for a business reveal about the business owner’s attitude toward financial risk?
    11·1 answer
  • A newspaper reports that the average price of new homes in a certain city had decreased, and the number of new homes sold had al
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!