Answer: (D) Non-compete agreement
Explanation:
The non- compete agreement is one of the type of contract in which the an employee are preventing and also discourage them for not leaving the position in an organization due to the competition.
The main objective of this agreement is is avoid the utilization of the confidential information or data by another firm through employee of that company.
According to the given question, the Rachael signed the Non-compete agreement as it is one of the employment agreement that if she leaving the IKEA organization for any reason then she will not be able to work with the company that is competes against the IKEA organization for the two years.
Therefore, Option (D) is correct answer.
Answer:
NPV = $262,604.7
Explanation:
<em>The NPV is the difference between the PV of cash inflows and the PV of cash outflows. A positive NPV implies a good investment decision and a negative figure implies the opposite.
</em>
NPV of an investment:
NPV = PV of Cash inflows - PV of cash outflow
PV of annuity= 1 -(1+r)^(-n)/r × Annual cash flow
r- discount rate, n- number of years
PV of cashinflow = 133,000 × (1- 1.13^(-4))/0.13 =395,604.6863
NPV = 395,604.6863 - 133,000= 262,604.7
NPV = $262,604.7
Answer:
Socially responsible
Explanation:
A socially responsible company is one that seeks to identify as well as relieve the social needs in its business environment.
A major social problem or need around the world is the lack of clean drinking water and birthing services. Thus, by proffering solutions to this problem loyal customer of TOMS shoe company could notice that the company takes seriously its responsibility to the society.
Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
In a perfectly competitive market, it is assumed that the buyers and sellers have perfect information and take their economic decisions accordingly. But in reality, buyers and sellers do not have perfect information.
Information comes at a cost, which can sometimes be high. The rational decisions of the consumers without full information can lead to irrational outcomes.
If the cost of gathering information is less than or equal to the benefit earned from the information, the consumers will gather information and make fully informed decisions.
But if the cost is higher than the benefits, the consumers will not gather information and make a less informed decision.
