Answer:
Hitler not only 'isolated' the Jews based on their racial background but also extended this discrimination to other minority groups. He also ordered the execution of such people who he deemed "illegal" and inferior to the German people.
Explanation:
Infringement refers to the act of obstructing the progress or movement of something or someone or controlling and restrict the actions of something or someone. In this aspect, Adolf Hitler infringes on the rights of the Jewish people when he ostracized and deemed them "racially invalid" for the German Reich.
German leader and dictator Hitler imposed several laws and regulations that obstructed and limited the Jewish people from exercising their rights to live as German nationals/citizens. He introduced and implemented numerous policies that were racially discriminatory against the Jewish people.
One such law was the "Nuremberg Laws" which officially provides a definition of who is a German citizen and who is not. This law makes every person, irrespective of what religion he/she practices, a Jew if he/she is a descendent of a Jew. This law was a targeted attack on the Jews and the necessary step to isolate them from being equal to the "genuine" Germans.
Then, the Nuremberg Laws were extended to other minorities, including the gypsies, Sinti and Roma, and the Ne g r oe s.
And if that wasn't enough discrimination, Jews were taken to concentration camps, made to work, and exterminated as if they meant nothing.
All of these horrendous acts were a downright infringement on the rights of minorities.
Answer:
Allusion
Explanation:
Allusion is the name given to a rhetorical device in which an author makes a reference to a topic from a different context. This reference is usually indirect and the readers are responsible for making the connection between the two. In this case, the author makes an allusion to Nicholas Ridley, an English Bishop and martyr, burned alive on October 16, 1555.
Answer:The content of the message was extraordinarily important.
Explanation:The content of the message was extraordinarily important.
The protest document is urging readers to assert their opposition to the draft.
It views conscription (forced enrollment in the military) as a transgression of the citizens' rights protected by the Constitution. That is why the document asks people to resist the draft ("Do not submit to intimidation") because if they consent, they are also part of the problem. Submitting and being silent about their rights would mean that they are encouraging freedom violation: "If you do not assert and support your rights, you are helping to deny or disparage rights."
