Is being in a "habitable zone" enough to say the planet is habitable for human life? What characteristics would an Earth-like pl
anet need to have to support life? What challenges would we face traveling to and colonizing Kepler-186f, or other Earth-like planets outside of our solar system? Do you think scientists should spend time looking for Earth-like planets before we have the technology to visit them? Why or why not? No Response(s) Be the first to respond to the Discussion topic!
I belive the answer to the first one is no I would have to assume a habitual zone is one area on a planet. for example, an air conditioned building vs. the Savvanah dessert. However I am not sure maybe other answers will help more on this one. Sorry.... Earth-like planet would of course need water, plant life, animals, oxygen, fossil fuels etc. A challenge we would face on a travel to another liveable planet: do we have engough transportation? engough fuel to make it? How long can we live on this planet? Who or what else is present here? etc. Yes I do think they should discover a planet with earth like qualities befor investing in tools to get us to them. So money is not wasted. (make sure to put this into your own words )
Are you asking what she should do? If you're asking that i suggest whoever it is that got hurt to decide for herself. If the concussion is very bad and she have seen a doctor and they told you to sit out or something else then you should do as told. But if its mild, then she can know her limits and what she wants to do.
<span>D. the poverty threshold. This differs based on geography (certain areas of the country are more expensive to live in than others) and family size.</span>
