Is being in a "habitable zone" enough to say the planet is habitable for human life? What characteristics would an Earth-like pl
anet need to have to support life? What challenges would we face traveling to and colonizing Kepler-186f, or other Earth-like planets outside of our solar system? Do you think scientists should spend time looking for Earth-like planets before we have the technology to visit them? Why or why not? No Response(s) Be the first to respond to the Discussion topic!
I belive the answer to the first one is no I would have to assume a habitual zone is one area on a planet. for example, an air conditioned building vs. the Savvanah dessert. However I am not sure maybe other answers will help more on this one. Sorry.... Earth-like planet would of course need water, plant life, animals, oxygen, fossil fuels etc. A challenge we would face on a travel to another liveable planet: do we have engough transportation? engough fuel to make it? How long can we live on this planet? Who or what else is present here? etc. Yes I do think they should discover a planet with earth like qualities befor investing in tools to get us to them. So money is not wasted. (make sure to put this into your own words )
Biases - " lacking a neutral viewpoint, or not having an open mind".
The potential biases that could hapen in this experiment are different intakes or types of coffee. For Example, Cold, Hot, Caramel. And each as a different size. Sugar intake is also another problem here.
