Answer: The last option.
Explanation: The precautionary principle would be considered to be most strictly applied where the precautionary measure is most disproportionate to the given risk. In all but the last option, there are either measures taken in response to concrete problems, or the precautionary measures are actually relaxed. In the last option, though, there are merely “fears” that antibiotics and growth hormones could cause harm (no experimental evidence), but the school board still takes the strict precautionary measure of mandating that schools only serve organic milk.
Lol. Here I am.. Saying whatever the heck I want. :)
One key similarity would be that they all started off as colonial powers ruled by larger power in Europe. Most of these nations gained independence through revolution as well, while a smaller amount gained it by the European state giving the colony independence (canada, Jamaica), Cuba was also technically both (revolution against spanish to be ruled by America, given Independence by America). A big difference is that most of North america was ruled by the British and the French, while South and Central America were settled predominantly by the Spanish and Portuguese. This resulted in huge differences in culture, including language (English/french vs Spanish/Portuguese) and religion (Protestantism vs Catholicism).
I could help you what dose that mean
This question is an example of the fallacy of correlation and causation.
The fallacy exists due to the fact that human beings like to find cause and effects towards the things that to not exist.
So they have to fabricate patterns that would end up making two different variables and situations to be closely similar.
Read more on fallacy here:
brainly.com/question/20939336
