Answer:
The scientist if the field of sociology of law
Explanation:
The sociology of law is a branch of sociology that studies the interactions of the institute of law with other social institutions. The sphere of interests of the sociology of law includes the study of the genesis, dynamics, structure of legal norms, as well as their social conditioning and role in society.
The subjects of jurisprudence as a science and sociology of law at some points are closely related to each other, but, nevertheless, they should be clearly separated from each other. In the most general sense, the sociology of law is engaged in the study of law as a social institution, that is, the subject of this science is a combination of various types of interaction of law as an institution with society, the dynamics of the development of legal culture, legislative and law-making processes through the prism of the influence of society on them and their impact on it. The effectiveness of created legislation also remains a relevant subject of empirical research.
Another characteristic feature of the object of study of this science is that it focuses not on a narrow analysis of the rule of law, their historical and social prerequisites, but analyzes the system of law in its dynamics, development, and directly considers the behavior of people and groups of people in a constant legislative process and changes in the legal system.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The New Deal helped America.
The correct option is C.
Vernacular language is the native language of the ordinary people of a population, who are not educated, it usually differ from the national language. The emergence of vernacular language in the medieval Europe signifies the interest in ordinary people and the stories that entertained and educate them. The learned take the pains to write down document in the vernacular language so that the uneducated too can benefit from them.
There were brand new machines being made
No I don't think so since if this is in the US the voters have the opportunity over a long campaign to see the candidates in action and how they respond to questions so have time to form an opinion on who is best but personally as an outsider (Canadian) I often think you don't have much choice since there is seldom a candidate who genuinely is for the poor and oppressed and who recognizes the soveriegnity and territorial integrity of other countries.
