Early modern philosophy in Europe and Great Britain is awash with discussions of the emotions: they figure not only in philosophical psychology and related fields, but also in theories of epistemic method, metaphysics, ethics, political theory and practical reasoning in general. Moreover, interest in the emotions links philosophy with work in other, sometimes unexpected areas, such as medicine, art, literature, and practical guides on everything from child-rearing to the treatment of subordinates. Because of the breadth of the topic, this article can offer only an overview, but perhaps it will be enough to give some idea how philosophically rich and challenging the conception of the emotions was in this period. Most attention will be devoted to the familiar figures of early modern philosophy and how they conceived of the emotions as valuable, even indispensable aspects of embodied human life, which were largely constitutive of the self and identity that matter to us practically.
A word of caution is in order: there is a plethora of source material, and this entry is offered as a survey for organizing that material. Alas, much worthy material must be excluded here. This article and its supplements are designed for readers browsing for specific information, as well as those hardy souls who may wish to read it straight through. The main document offers a thematic overview of early modern discussions of the emotions. Separate links lead to documents devoted to the pre-history of the topic, as well as to some of the most important individual figures in early modern philosophy. Hope this helps! Mark brainly please this took me a lot of time!
<span>Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson
General Jackson died on May 10, 1863 as a result of pneumonia on week after he was accidentally shot by his own men during the Battle of Chancellorsville. After nightfall during the battle, when the active fighting had stopped, General Jackson performed some reconnaissance in preparation for more fighting in the morning. As he returned to camp, his own men opened fire, hitting him 3 times.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is the federal system. Power is shared between the two governments and states have the right to make their own laws as long as they're not unconstitutional or against the federal law. Federal law applies to all the states in a federation, like the United States has in the congress.
or b on edge
please give brainlist
Here is the answer of the given question above. The two primary sources of <span>conflict related to religion according to The Dalai Lama in "The Role of Religion in Modern Society" are RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY and POLITICO-ECONOMIC FACTORS. According to the Dalai Lama, if we lived in a world with only one religion, there would be a little chance of questioning the truth of that religion. Hope this answer helps.</span>
