Civil law
criminal law
lawyer bangs the gavel
Answer:
D) Checks and Balances
Explanation:
A is the belief of a strong National Government which has no part to do with this quote.
B is democracy which if the term is broken down demo = people, cracy = rule
Democracy is roughly translated to people- rule, which the people kind of due because we have the right to vote, but that is not the answer.
C is popular sovereignty which is when a vote is being taken if one has more votes for yes than votes no it will take place, become a law etc,.
So finally the answer is D because the branches all work together to make sure that none of them go askew and gain concentration of power and so this way if a law was to be passed it must go through all branches, unless the House of Representatives chooses to vote again, but that is a different topic.
Egypt developed around the Nile River, while Mesopotamia developed between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. ... Politically, both Egypt and Mesopotamia had a government with one main ruler, but Egypt had a centralized government with a pharaoh, while Mesopotamia had a decentralized government with a king.Oct 22, 2012
Answer:
The correct answer is D. The missionary brothers who converted the Slavic peoples of Moravia to the Orthodox Christianity of the Byzantine Empire were Cyril and Methodius.
Explanation:
Cyril and Methodius were two brothers born in the 8th century in Thessaloniki who became missionaries of Christianity in the Khazars and Moravia. They promoted the use of the Old Church Slavonic as a liturgical language and developed the Glagolitic alphabet, the predecessor of the Cyrillic alphabet.
In fact, the nickname of Cyril was Constantinos, and he worked as a philologist and university teacher in Constantinople. The original name of Methodius has still not been found out, but he was a monk and at some point in his life also worked as an administrator.
Answer:
the answer would be D tho,
Explanation:
Before the Panama Canal was completed in 1941, the only way to trade was to sail around Cape Horn in South America which was a 13,000 mile trip and it took about 3-6 months. It was a rough journey with seasickness, and treacherous waters. However, once the Panama Canal was completed, the distance was cut by almost half to 5200 miles and the time of journey down to about a month.
Because of the Canal, the U.S. was able to ship supplies so much faster. The faster a country can ship, the more willing they are to trade. They are willing to trade more because they don't have to spend so much money on fuel. Because they spend less money on fuel, they can carry more supplies. Now most all the money the U.S. gets from trade is through the Panama Canal. If you are confused, here is an example of how it works. If England were selling products to Peru, England's economy would suffer if the Canal were not operating. Without access to the Canal, the cost of exports from England to Peru would significantly increase because England would have to regain the added expenses involved in sailing around South America. Because of increased prices, Peru could not afford to purchase as many products from England, which in turn would decrease England's revenues gained from exports. Decreased revenues means that England would have less money available to purchase products from the United States and other countries. A "domino effect" would be set in motion as the United States and other countries experienced similar problems with their exports and imports.
America prospers from the same example. If San Fransisco wanted to make trade with New York, and they were trading perishable food items, the three month voyage (without the canal) would spoil the food. But with the Panama Canal the one month voyage would keep the goods perfectly ripe and ready for trade.
Hope this helps
