1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sophie [7]
2 years ago
8

write an argument that either agrees or disagrees with the following statement: “Natives and newcomers had fundamentally similar

perspectives and understandings of firsts contact.”
History
1 answer:
Eduardwww [97]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I don't know what if

Explanation:

hehehe???

You might be interested in
Which is most responsible for the rapid settlement of the great plains?
dalvyx [7]
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the "transcontinental railroad," since this provided for fast and relatively cheap transportation. </span></span>
7 0
3 years ago
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
3 years ago
According to the following graph, what is true about casualties during World War I?
Furkat [3]

Answer:

Russia has suffered the most casualties in Europe. Approx 1,700,000 were parishes and killed by the Wermacht. The trenches, starvation due to cold. The Germans were cruel to prisoners of war, resulting in high death rates

4 0
3 years ago
ILL GIVE BRAINLIST PLEASE ANSWER ASAP.
balu736 [363]

Answer:

all christians, but no one else

3 0
3 years ago
If a war were to start Egypt and Sudan, which supranational organization is best suited to help?
podryga [215]

Answer:

The United Nations! The United Nations is an international organization founded in the year of 1945 after the Second World War by sveral countries committed to maintaining international peace and<u> security</u> , developing friendly relations among nations,countries and regions and promoting  better living standards and human rights. The UN would definetly respond to such a conflict!!! Its their sole purpose to KEEP Peace or to help nations in wartime, And more!!!

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was a legislation that was not enforced in the 1760's?
    7·1 answer
  • A _________ is the place in war where active combat takes place?
    14·1 answer
  • In the 1800s, an important push factor for "new" immigrants was?
    8·2 answers
  • Following the stock market crash in 1929, President Hoover was criticized for...
    15·1 answer
  • What message did the Boston tea party send to the british government?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following was not an outcome of the revolutions in Latin America? a)The colonial governments became authoritarian.
    11·2 answers
  • Match these items with their proper descriptions. 1. right to all land from the Atlantic to the Pacific Delaware 2. 2,900,000 im
    8·2 answers
  • What was the primary motivation for campaigns promoting human rights<br> during the 20th century?
    7·1 answer
  • What did israel ultimately gain from its participation in the Suez Canal war?
    10·2 answers
  • Summarize the progressive policies achieved under President Taft.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!